EACME
  • Events
  • Awards
  • Early Career
  • Members
  • Structure
  • Contact
Login

EACME Newsletter 52

  • 8 August 2019
  • No Comments
  • 1064 Views
News, Newsletter

Download the full August 2019 EACME Newsletter

Contents

 Editorial 1  G. Birchley 

News from the EACME Bureau  R. Horn 

EACME CONFERENCE 2019 M. Parker and R. Horn

Professional Ethics at the end of Life International Workshop for Young Scholars, M. French and A-H Seidlein

The Path to fostering good science The Embassy of Good Science
I. Lechner, N. Evans, G. Widdershoven

Project Report L. Kaelin, D. Harrer, M. Fuchs

Conference SNEC Lausanne

Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support CESS

Workshop of the UK-France Genomics and Ethics Network R. Horn and M. Gaille

Empirical Bioethics in Peru E. Valenti

The Teaching of Bioethics for health professionals from a transdisciplinary viewpoint Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Vacancy Executive Board Secretary

New EACME member BEC Montréal

Book review  J. Martin 

Deadline of next EACME Newsletter

Editorial Board

Editorial

It seems after two successive years when UK medical ethics found itself in the international spotlight over cases of withdrawal of medical treatment over spring and summer, it is now the turn of France. The case of Vincent Lambert, a 42-year-old man in a continuing vegetative state (CVS) after a road traffic accident, from whom his doctors proposed to withdraw the tube feeding that was keeping him alive, once again saw the courts settling a family, and societal, disagreement. Vincent’s parents and two of his siblings opposed withdrawal of treatment, while Vincent’s wife and six other siblings agreed that withdrawal would have been in accordance with Vincent’s past wishes. The case was the subject of public protests and impassioned debate that appeared little changed from that which in the past accompanied similar cases internationally, such as Terri Schiavo in the USA, Eluana Englaro in Italy and Anthony Bland in the UK. Those who supported withdrawal argued that a life in CVS was so diminished patients could not experience anything, be it pain or joy. Such a life was not worth living on its own account, and furthermore, that the past wishes of the patient should be followed in such cases. Those who opposed withdrawal argued that life had an intrinsic value, that there was no way of telling what the patient with CVS would want contemporaneously, whatever their wishes in the past, but that withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from somebody who was not actively dying was both illogical and unspeakably cruel. These arguments are essentially the same as those heard in every similar case in the past forty years. Despite this apparent repetition, all this seems to have some value. It highlights the important work of bioethicists, amid extremely emotive issues, to help the public to look rationally at the world, so the world looks rationally back (to paraphrase Hegel). This is not to say that rationality is the end of the story – the importance of emotion in being a full human being has been rather too little stated in philosophical bioethics – yet the complex role of rational argument as a glue that strengthens a society’s ability to find acceptance amid emotive disagreements shows that bioethics can have an important function.

It is therefore not without some (positive) emotion that I present the latest EACME newsletter. As you shall see the newsletter covers an impressive and broad range of activities and reports, including a discussion of empirical bioethics in Peru and reports on research projects as diverse as the ethics of genome editing and the evaluation of clinical ethics support, as well as book reviews and workshop reports. I hope you enjoy these, and I am looking forward to meeting many of you in Oxford this year for the EACME 2019 conference, in what promises to offer both healthy debate, rational deliberation and (hopefully) some joyous moments!

Dr Giles Birchley 

Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, U.K. 

Giles.birchley@bristol.ac.uk 

Download the full August 2019 EACME Newsletter

EACME Newsletter 51
EACME Newsletter 53
Related Posts
  • EACME Newsletter 62 13 December 2022
  • EACME Newsletter 61 14 September 2022
  • EACME Newsletter 60 14 April 2022

EACME

Maastricht University FHML
P.O. Box 616
6200 MD MAASTRICHT
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 43 3882145

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Centres of Medical Ethics

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy PolicyCookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT